Full knowledge base
Routinised recognition and anxiety: Understanding the deterioration in Sino-Japanese relations
Resource type
Author/contributor
- Gustafsson, Karl (Author)
Title
Routinised recognition and anxiety: Understanding the deterioration in Sino-Japanese relations
Abstract
Why do interstate relations deteriorate and become conflictual, even under conditions where one might expect improved ties? The article seeks an answer to this question through a case study of the deterioration in Sino-Japanese relations in the twenty-first century, which took place despite the existence of several factors that might be thought likely to have led to an improvement. Existing theoretical approaches cannot fully explain this puzzle. The article argues that such deteriorations can result from disruptions to states' reciprocally performed routinised recognition, and identifies three mechanisms through which these can occur. To facilitate this argument, the article draws on scholarship on relational identity, recognition, and ontological security to develop a theory of identity construction that takes account of how self and other routinise the ways in which they recognise each other and how they react to the other's representational practices.
Publication
Review of International Studies
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
613-633
Date
2016-10
Language
English
ISSN
02602105
Short Title
Routinised recognition and anxiety
Accessed
27/01/2023, 07:27
Library Catalog
ProQuest
Rights
© British International Studies Association 2016 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Extra
Num Pages: 21
Place: London, United Kingdom
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Citation
Gustafsson, K. (2016). Routinised recognition and anxiety: Understanding the deterioration in Sino-Japanese relations. Review of International Studies, 42(4), 613–633. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210515000546
Link to this record